<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPL FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2003/03/31/gpl-fud/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2003/03/31/gpl-fud</link>
	<description>Don't Panic!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2003/03/31/gpl-fud/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2003/03/31/gpl-fud/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>That is a terrible essay.  It lacks form.  The author is upset about something, begins rationally enough, but by the end it becomes name-calling and mud-slinging.  It really gets bad after &quot;Without singling out any application...&quot;.  Stop being a wimp, Chris; name one.  I know that there are bad GPL applications, but I can also think of bad proprietary applications (I know you are thinking of Windows 95, so I won&#039;t mention it).  That paragraph is pointless. 

My biggest complaint is lack of grammatical awareness.  Peppered with contractions, colloquialisms (&quot;suffice it to say&quot;), and improperly placed apostrophes, this essay is annoying to read.  Sentence fragments.

That was a dumb essay.  Thanks for posting it, Chad.  I feel better about myself.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a terrible essay.  It lacks form.  The author is upset about something, begins rationally enough, but by the end it becomes name-calling and mud-slinging.  It really gets bad after &#8220;Without singling out any application&#8230;&#8221;.  Stop being a wimp, Chris; name one.  I know that there are bad GPL applications, but I can also think of bad proprietary applications (I know you are thinking of Windows 95, so I won&#8217;t mention it).  That paragraph is pointless. </p>
<p>My biggest complaint is lack of grammatical awareness.  Peppered with contractions, colloquialisms (&#8220;suffice it to say&#8221;), and improperly placed apostrophes, this essay is annoying to read.  Sentence fragments.</p>
<p>That was a dumb essay.  Thanks for posting it, Chad.  I feel better about myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

