<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Mr. Cruise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2005/06/01/dear-mr-cruise/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2005/06/01/dear-mr-cruise</link>
	<description>Don't Panic!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jynnan Tonnyx &#187; Archives &#187; Brilliant!</title>
		<link>http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2005/06/01/dear-mr-cruise/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Jynnan Tonnyx &#187; Archives &#187; Brilliant!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jynnantonnyx.com/?p=99#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] As a follow-up to my previous invective-laden diatribe, I thought you&#8217;d be interested to see that the same people who brought us welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com are at it again with tomcruiseisnuts.com. I particularly love their &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; at the bottom:  Our use of the term &#8220;nuts&#8221; is meant, as defined in Webster&#8217;s, as a reference to an &#8220;eccentric&#8221; person. That&#8217;s all. We do not mean to in any way denigrate or belittle anyone with mental illness. In fact, we take mental illness very seriously, which is why Mr. Cruise&#8217;s ill-informed rant inspired us to create this website. We don&#8217;t have anything personally against Mr. Cruise, either. We think he&#8217;s a first-class actor and a humanitarian. We did used to worry that he was a misguided zealot, but that&#8217;s all. Now we think he&#8217;s a dangerous, misguided zealot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a follow-up to my previous invective-laden diatribe, I thought you&#8217;d be interested to see that the same people who brought us welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com are at it again with tomcruiseisnuts.com. I particularly love their &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; at the bottom:  Our use of the term &#8220;nuts&#8221; is meant, as defined in Webster&#8217;s, as a reference to an &#8220;eccentric&#8221; person. That&#8217;s all. We do not mean to in any way denigrate or belittle anyone with mental illness. In fact, we take mental illness very seriously, which is why Mr. Cruise&#8217;s ill-informed rant inspired us to create this website. We don&#8217;t have anything personally against Mr. Cruise, either. We think he&#8217;s a first-class actor and a humanitarian. We did used to worry that he was a misguided zealot, but that&#8217;s all. Now we think he&#8217;s a dangerous, misguided zealot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://jynnantonnyx.com/archives/2005/06/01/dear-mr-cruise/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jynnantonnyx.com/?p=99#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Tom Cruise wields English like a foreign language.  He is speaking, so we can be somewhat flexible about rules of grammar (although his errors require the flexibility of a contortionist).  His rhetorical errors should not be forgiven.  For example, &quot;Scientifically, you can prove that.&quot;  I am sure that I cannot.  Perhaps what he should have said is, &quot;It has been shown that...in a study done by Dr. X. Crackpot...published in the Washington Times.&quot;  Tom, when you present a thesis, you need to present supporting evidence.  If said evidence does not exist, perhaps you should reconsider the thesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Cruise wields English like a foreign language.  He is speaking, so we can be somewhat flexible about rules of grammar (although his errors require the flexibility of a contortionist).  His rhetorical errors should not be forgiven.  For example, &#8220;Scientifically, you can prove that.&#8221;  I am sure that I cannot.  Perhaps what he should have said is, &#8220;It has been shown that&#8230;in a study done by Dr. X. Crackpot&#8230;published in the Washington Times.&#8221;  Tom, when you present a thesis, you need to present supporting evidence.  If said evidence does not exist, perhaps you should reconsider the thesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

